Friday, March 04, 2005

Old man Rather

So check out these paragraphs from this article:
Rather said that to his mind, two of the panel's most important conclusions were
that it could not demonstrate that political bias played a part in the stories
or conclusively account for the origins of the documents in question.

Yeah, sure, there was NO poitical bias in the least bit. Do I need to remind you people that I don't mind being call a dumb*** directly, but this crap really ticks me off.
"Although they had four months and millions of dollars, they could not demonstrate that the documents were not authentic, that they were forgeries," Rather said.

Hmm... I'm guessing Charles didn't have $20 into it and spent less than a day figuring this crap out.

Let me give any old men out there who might think we'll fall for this kind of crap a little advice: I don't care how old you are. Jerry's Uncle Leo tried the "I'm old. I didn't know. I thought I'd paid for it" routine and it didn't work - it ain't going to work with us, either, OLD MAN!